I am a hatemonger! I didn't realize it at first , but when one enters the public fray, one put's oneself at the discretion of the faceless and many times nameless, who courageously attack your character and point of view and then fade back into the void that is their writing desk which usually amounts to the lunch room at their factory day-job where they're constantly griping about forced overtime to complete an order. Let me first acknowledge in wondorous righteous indignation that if there was ever an overused, under substantiated word designed not to enlighten but instead to censor, it's the word hatemonger.Where I have up to this point received the most accusations about being part of this illustrious group of "mongers" is from a routine in my project "A Conservative Unleashed" about gay marriage that used the line "Guys want to marry guys?...COWARDS!!" Interestingly enough the writer of my New Yorker profile, Adam Green (who leans liberal minded) found the line one of his favorites, but then again he ACTUALLY SAW MY SHOW and so he perceived the sarcasm that essentially was commenting on how hard it is to be married to a member of the opposite sex. Actually when viewed in it's entirety I spend much more time lambasting heterosexual divorce than gay marriage but to know that would also mean that the liberal minded who accused me of hatemongering would have actually had to do research I.E. ( actually watch the show w/o taking lines out of context) which I believe is a little too much to expect from any liberal pseudo-journalist, don't ya think? Just ask Dan Rather, and he's a PRO! Sorry people but I'm just tired of the word. I simply find the word hatemonger insipid and useless in actually trying to accomplish something useful because usually it's applied not to people that actually hate others, but to people who want the right to disagree with what some others do and therein lies the rub. To say for example " I hate pygmies and wish they were dead" at least could substantiate the claim hatemonger. But to say " I hate the way some pygmies EAT people" would simply be making a social commentary about a behavior which has NOTHING to do with hate. Not that I believe pygmies actually eat people but it does make for a humorous sentence that is an attention grabber. Something about Pygmies that makes the rest of humanity stand up and take notice! If there is any one group in this country that has created the most nonsensical words to defend itself it's the gay lobby. Remember they are the ones that invented the word "homophobia" which from the root words "homo"-(same) and "phobia"-(irrational fear) , we have a word that literally means "irrational fear of the same".The same "what" you ask, sorry I'm at a loss. I guess you'll have to refer to the gay linguists who coin a phrase anytime their behavior is questioned. This I CAN say from my own mouth..or..er..fingers, I don"t hate anybody. Thus by American rule of law, if you now accuse me of hate the onus of proof is on you. If you are of the camp though that finds satisfaction in slandering someone who simply disagrees with certain human behavioral choices then you are instantly in effect disagreeing with my intellectual choice and since I'm straight, it's obvious you are a heterophobe. I figure one nonsense word deserves another. I don't know what circles one must run in that find intimidation an effective means to gag others , but as a comedian who is a professional rhetorician, I'm afraid it won't work on me.Not that the liberal minded PC brigades won't still try the technique but what would you expect from an Heterphobic, Christaphobic, Conservativaphobic, Theistiphobic, Dialougaphobic, Tolerantaphobic, Fairmindedaphobic, liberal minded bigot? I rest my case.